book club

Jan. 2nd, 2012 07:06 pm
terabient: A smiling cartoon octopus, holding a book in each tentacle (octopus books - art by tad carpenter)
My reading goal for 2011 was to read 40 books. I only managed 30. SIGH. At least there were some pretty huge tomes in that 30.

I enjoyed most of what I read although I didn't find much of it outstanding, just pleasant and/or interesting. But that's still a pretty good achievement for a book! There was only one that ended up being completely forgettable. (It was Plus Blood in Their Veins, which I should have expected considering it was a pulp fiction novel that cost me about a quarter.)

For those interested nobody?, my 2011 Book List )

You can ask me questions about how ~awesome (or not ~awesome) these books are and I will probably answer them!

ALSO. This week I am going to go on my New Year's book buying binge on Amazon, but I don't have many books picked out yet, so! SUGGESTIONS FOR EXCELLENT READING would be appreciated.

My book collection has outgrown my shelf space, so I may do a book giveaway in the near future. Just in case anyone is interested.
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (Default)
Have a teeny book meme, since I can't think of anything else to do. :D

What book are you currently reading?

The Last Panda, by George B. Shaller.

How far in are you?

About 150 pages in, with roughly 100 pages left. Hoping to finish by Thursday.

What's it about?

Short, obvious answer: Pandas! Better answer: It is the account of the World Wildlife Fund's initial efforts with the Chinese government to study pandas and set up formal, modern research centers for conservation efforts in Sichuan.

Are you enjoying it?

It's slow going at first; there's a great deal on the difficulties encountered in first setting up the international collaboration, and while that kind of tension can be interesting (and is in later chapters) it's presented in a way that's very tedious and dry.

Once that's over, though, there's lots of detailed description of how day-to-day research is done, and there's a special emphasis on how seemingly small facts or observations can be used to draw unexpected conclusions.

And of course, there are pictures of pandas. :3

So far, it's been an enjoyable read.
terabient: Super-deformed Noel trying to write (Blazblue: Noel - poem fail)
Apropos of nothing: I enjoyed this pithy dig at Twilight.

On the subject of books, I set this year's goal at 40 books. So far I've finished sixteen. /FAIL If I count graphic novels the number is probably in the mid twenties but that feels like cheating. My book pile is still pretty huge, but I can't seem to concentrate on fiction these days, and I don't have much nonfiction in my list. Time to go browsing at the library! Suggestions are always welcome, of course - I'm most interested in Asian and Middle Eastern history at the moment, but any subject that's presented well is fine.

To round things out, it's meme revival time!

30 Days Fanfiction Meme

Day 4: Do you have a "muse" character, that speaks to you more than others, or that tries to push their way in, even when the fic isn't about them? Who are they, and why did that character became your muse?


Not really? I have favorite characters who I write about, but that's not the same as being inspired in the way people who say they have 'muses' are. For me, there is a lot of conscious thought that goes into the development of fic ideas - I'm not really the sort of person who gets random plot bunnies - though I wish I could. :c

boring answer is boring

the rest of the meme )
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (Default)
1. Which hour was most daunting for you?
Hour 22 was pretty rough. I think I actually fell asleep for a few minutes, there.

2. Could you list a few high-interest books that you think could keep a Reader engaged for next year?
Hmmm....I think Natsuo Kirino's Real World or Out would be good picks. I didn't read them this time around, but Real World is short but hits hard, and Out is a very different kind of murder mystery. Both are written in an unpretentious, clear style that would be helpful in the later hours, I think.

They do contain triggery material for people, especially women, who have suffered abuse. So while I recommend them, it is with some reservation; they are not suited for everyone.

3. Do you have any suggestions for how to improve the Read-a-thon next year?
Hmmm...well, as a first-time participant I was a bit confused by some of the dates in the information sections of the site. Times and a few other things on the FAQ were from 2010/2009. So making sure those references are current would help.

4. What do you think worked really well in this year’s Read-a-thon?
I really enjoyed the tweeting aspect, it was very encouraging to read about people's progress in an abbreviated form. With blog posts, I sometimes spent a lot more time than I intended reading through posts and subsequent comments. ^^;

5. How many books did you read?
Six, seven if the one I am not going to finish in time counts ;)

6. What were the names of the books you read?
2666, Roberto Bolano
The Cage, Kenzo Kitakata
Confessions, Kang Zhengguo
Parasite Rex, Carl Zimmer
The Tale of Peter Rabbit, Beatrix Potter
The German Shepherd Dog, Howell Book House
(Unfinished) The River at the Center of the World, Simon Winchester

7. Which book did you enjoy most?
Confessions was a very striking memoir and demonstrated the difficulties of living in China during Mao's reign superbly. And I always enjoy Beatrix Potter ^^

8. Which did you enjoy least?
The author of The River at the Center of the World comes off as patronizing and bombastic, so...

9. If you were a Cheerleader, do you have any advice for next year’s Cheerleaders?
I was not a cheerleader but I might try it next year? I thought this year's cheerleaders did well :)

10. How likely are you to participate in the Read-a-thon again? What role would you be likely to take next time?
I would love to try it next year! I don't know if I'd stay up the whole 24 hours, though. I kind of wish I had tried more of the mini-challenges, in retrospect, as they were quite clever and I enjoyed seeing what others did for them. Also, being a cheerleader looks like a lot of fun; I might try that.
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (Default)
As of 5:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, I have read 6 books:

2666 Roberto Bolano
The Cage Kenzo Kitakata
Confessions Kang Zhengguo
Parasite Rex Carl Zimmer
The Tale of Peter Rabbit Beatrix Potter
The German Shepherd Dog Howell Book House

Although technically I only read the last 100~ pages of 2666, so that would be...uh... 5 and 1/4 books? Hahaha

After all this is done (I don't want to spend TOO MUCH time posting) I'm thinking of posting all of the lines and passages that I found particularly striking or memorable or bizarre. This assuming I can remember anything after what will probably be a very long nap ;)

Two teaser lines, to give you a taste of what I've been reading:

I could barely pronounce his English name, so I adopted the Xi'an custom of calling him Stinky Egg.

Finally, one day, the ant meets its awful end: the parasite dissolves the connection between the head and the rest of the body.


Almost there!
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (Default)
It's a bit late to be posting this, but I'm participating in Dewey's 24-hour Read-a-thon today. I am posting updates through Twitter (http://twitter.com/#!/janejana) if you're interested in watching my progress.

I will also edit this post throughout the day. Also, even thought the read-a-thon has already started, feel free to hop in and share what you're reading too! :)

Just finished my first book - 2666 by Roberto Bolano. (I know, I said I wouldn't finish it, and that it probably wouldn't get better after the first 150 pages. I lied and was wrong. Ending was frustrating, though.)

Wish me luck!

---

Mid-point Update:

1. What are you reading right now?

Still working through Confessions by Kang Zhengguo, the memoirs of a man growing up during China's Cultural Revolution.

2. How many books have you read so far?

Two and a half: 2666, The Cage and my current book. All together I've read about 600 pages.

3. What book are you most looking forward to for the second half of the Read-a-thon?

I have a huge pile of books that I am pulling from without much forethought, so I don't know for sure what I will read even at this point, lol. But I really like the look of Parasite Rex, a nonfiction book about super gross but super cool parasites. ^^

4. Did you have to make any special arrangements to free up your whole day?

Nope!

5. Have you had many interruptions? How did you deal with those?

I've had to take breaks so my darling sheltie, Momo, gets exercise and attention, but she's been unusually quiet today. She spent most of the day sitting next to me and has only wanted to go outside to play a few times. How considerate of her :)

6. What surprises you most about the Read-a-thon, so far?

How easy it's been to get sucked into the twitter feed XD

7. Do you have any suggestions for how to improve the Read-a-thon next year?

Not really!

8. What would you do differently, as a Reader or a Cheerleader, if you were to do this again next year?

I'd structure my book list more carefully - add a few shorter books to the list, maybe some more light-hearted fare. I've enjoyed what I've read so far, but there's really only one 'fun' book in my pile and I could go for a few more.

9. Are you getting tired yet?

Nope, which is totally surprising - I thought for sure around now I'd be a little drowsy. I bet I'll start crashing around midnight, though.

10. Do you have any tips for other Readers or Cheerleaders, something you think is working well for you that others may not have discovered?

I haven't done it yet today, but whenever I have to stay up for long periods of time I try to do 'morning' things late in the evening. I plan on showering around 9pm and will have cereal and toast for dinner - it sort of tricks the body into thinking it's morning, I guess? Anyway, it worked for me in college when I had to pull all-nighters. :P
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (Hyperbole & 1/2: Responsible Adult)
so, every time i make a personal commitment to do something, uh, internetty, for lack of a better term, like this blog once a day thing or finish some mediocre fanfiction or doodle shit or whatever, my life - which until said decision had been content to be a gaping hole of boredom and suck - decides it would be a really great time to become ~eventful~ once again. And it's never, you know, one or two ~events~, it's like the universe is making up for lost time and crunching three or four months' worth of THE HAPS into a week. And I am like: "Why, Fate? Why?"

Then I stop because talking to nonexistent entities, like multiple exclamation points, is a sure sign of a diseased mind, and also counterproductive to my current task of filling out a sea of paperwork in which i must give detailed answers to the question Why do you fail so hard at life?

If you are wondering what i am going on about, don't. because i'm not quite sure i know, either, only that i have been doing it for the past uhhhh three days i believe.

***

in other news, i think i have a book problem.

book stack )

Out of that to-read pile, i've only finished The River Ki, The Stranger, and What is the What; I've started Dracula: Prince of Many Faces, Dracula's Guest, Kraken, 2666, and P.S. Your Cat Is Dead. Which sounds ridiculous, i know, but my reading sessions go something like this:

"Hey, self! You know what sounds like a smashing good read? Victorian vampire fiction!"

*30 pages in*

"You know what, I am just not feeling up for fictional vampires today. I'm going to read about the real Dracula!"

*30 pages in*

"Okay, let's be honest, even Dracula can't salvage dry history texts. Time for some giant squid cult action!"

*30 pages in*

"Fuck, could this narrator be any more of a hipster douchebag? Gawd. I'm going to read some real literature."

*30 pages in*

"Oh. I forgot a hundred pages describing nothing but the passage of time as expressed through the changing of seasons is the calling card of Japanese writers. Fuck this, I'm going to watch some douchebags fail at life on tv."

And thus, five books started, no books finished. MISERY AND WOE!

***

CLUMSY SEGUE!

Anyway, I was planning to dick around on XBL like I usually do last night, BUT i had completely forgotten that there was a SUPER IMPORTANT BASKETBALL GAME between MAH TEAM the Celtics and the Miami Superfriends that i had to watch w/ assorted RL semi-friends. I do like to pretend i have some actual, flesh-and-blood people i can tolerate for the approximate length of a basketball game, and also i genuinely enjoy b-ball, so i resisted my first inclination to ditch everyone for the joys of the interwebs.

And man, i was NOT disappointed.

Since I'm pretty sure 0% of my flist is interested in basketball, i'll try to keep the summary to the juicy drama: the Miami Heat Superfriends currently has the NBA's most self-indulgent player, Lebron James, on its roster. How self-indulgent, you may ask? Well, he had an hour-long ESPN special broadcast that was basically about how fabulous he was as a human being, and so that he could destroy the city of Cleveland with this really awkward announcement of his move to Miami:

the show was called 'The Decision.' With capital letters and everything, for added gravitas and/or asshattery )
Seriously. "Taking my talents to South Beach." Who talks like that? Assholes, that's who.

Anyway, the Miami Superfriends are were supposed to be *the* team to beat this year, with people predicting 72+ wins (in an 82-game season) and all sorts of jackassery. Currently, though, they are 5-4, and they lost last night in the *best* way possible: a massive, embarrassing meltdown in the face of a monstrously good Celtics performance. Basically, I got both the childish glee of watching my favorite team perform high-flying dunks and ridiculous ally-oops and ninja passes and all sorts of cool things while also indulging in the sweet, sweet taste of schaudenfreude that comes from watching the 'best player in the league' brick a three-pointer by hurling the ball off the backboard. A+++++ game, Miami!

AND THEN! After the game my favorite player ever, Paul Pierce (seriously i have his jersey and wore it last night and everything it is kind of embarrassing because it hurts my geek cred) used the Amazing Technology of Twitter to start some awesome trash talking:

tweet tweet ;D )

AWWWWWW YEAAAAAAAH

Also after the game he was wearing some pretty rockin' glasses that made me :)

glasses )

4 minutes before i miss the day! PHEW.
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (Reading FUCK YEAH)
I finished the book The Angel's Game this morning after months of picking it up, starting it, getting about 100 pages in, then forgetting about it only to pick it up a few weeks later and start all over again. This is not to say it was a difficult book - far from it - I just wasn't engaged by it for the longest time. After finishing it, I still can't say with certainty whether I enjoyed it or not.

The particulars: the book is described as 'Gothic horror mystery;' it's about a pulp fiction author being contracted to write a book so moving, it becomes a religion unto itself!!!, so it is also a mediation on the act of writing and story crafting. That's a whole lot of pots going at once.

I can't say that it all comes together and works, because it doesn't, but it's a strange kind of failure. The various elements at work never become as compelling as they could, but they fail...on their own merits, so to speak; they don't interfere with each other, if that makes sense. The mystery at the heart of the novel is never truly resolved, and the revelations that do occur fall apart the more one considers them. The setting is undeniably, deliciously Gothic but for all the descriptions of crumbling cemeteries and pools of blood beneath the city and people burned alive there's never a strong sense of horror. I am not sure if something was lost in translation from Spanish to English, but basically...stuff happens, and despite the elegance of the prose I found it impossible for the dread of the situation to sink in.

There's also a requisite romantic subplot which ends up gaining more importance toward the end, which I found unexpectedly touching, even though it was not paticularly well developed and it ends in a very strange, almost...time paradoxical way. Guess I'm just a sucker for prettily-described, doomed romances.

So there's not a whole lot that is striking in this book (at least plotwise) but I can't say I disliked it - for all its flaws there are a lot of witty and beautiful lines. It's a very quotable book, if terribly melodramatic:

"A writer never forgets the first time he accepted a few coins or a word of praise in exchange for a story. He will never forget the sweet poison of vanity in his blood and the belief that, if he succeeds in not letting anyone discover his lack of talent, the dream of literature will provide him with a roof over his head, a hot meal at the end of the day, and what he covets the most: his name printed on a miserable piece of paper that surely will outlive him. A writer is condemned to remember that moment, because from then on he is doomed and his soul has a price."

"The only way you can truly get to know an author is through the trail of ink he leaves behind him. The person you think you see is only an empty character: truth is always hidden in fiction."

"Isabella, if you really want to devote yourself to writing, or at least to writing something others will read, you're going to have to get used to sometimes being ignored, insulted, and despised and to almost always being considered with indifference. It's an occupational hazard."

"I think you judge yourself too severely, a quality that always distinguishes people of true worth."

"Never underestimate a writer's vanity, especially that of a mediocre writer."

"Don Basilio was a forbidding-looking man with a bushy mustache who did not suffer fools and who subscribed to the theory that the liberal use of adverbs and adjectives was the mark of a pervert or someone with a vitamin deficiency."

"The disease afflicting you has a name, and that is Grand Guignol: it does to drama what syphilis does to your privates. Getting it might be pleasurable, but from then on it's all downhill."

Decidedly overcooked and overthought, but I eat this kind of stuff up. And the book is peppered with these savory little phrases. They are really what make the book worth reading, more than anything else.

***


Been trying to figure out what to do with my Dreamwidth account I've been mulling over the idea of starting a community there - something like a "I love this book" or "I love this song!" sharing community, because I like talking about books and music and listening to others talk about books and music they like. I mean, I'm sure there are tons of communities on both LJ and DW that already have the same idea, but idk i want to create one anyway. ;o;

I don't suppose any of the LJ/DW ppl on my flist would be interested in participating in a book/music community? I think it'd be fun.
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (celica: sleepy)
here are all the books i read in 2009. IT IS A THRILLING LIST LET ME TELL YOU (actually no :p )

no rhyme or reason. just all the books i can remember reading. :)

books: fiction )

books: nonfiction )

24 in total. there are probably a few - possibly more than a few - that I'm missing, especially in the nonfiction section, but still: FAIL :(

(my aim was to read at least 30 books)

will add 2010 planned reading list soon, maybe~
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (FUCKING CUPCAKE - art by Natalie Dee)
Dear book reviewers everywhere:

A book does not require a likable main character to be good. A good book does not require any likable, or even relatable, characters.

The purpose of a book - at least in books that aspire to qualify as literary (itself a sometimes problematic concept, but that's a whole 'nother kettle of fish) - is to convey a message, an idea, about some aspect of the world to readers. Sometimes, a narrative that contains only unlikable characters is necessary in order to illustrate an author's theme. Reading a book where, say, all the characters are ruthless and cruel and end up winning at everything can be, should be, emotionally unsatisfying, but that doesn't mean it's a poorly written book, because maybe the author's purpose wasn't to write an emotionally satisfying story. Maybe the author wanted to say, "Hey readers, horrible people get what they want and it sucks."

Disagreeing with an author's theme or premise is a valid criticism. Believing a point would have been better made through the inclusion of sympathetic or 'likable' characters is a valid criticism. Pointing out that a character is not likable when it is clear the author intends to have said character be likable is a valid criticism.

What isn't a valid criticism: saying a book sucks because there were not any characters you felt you could 'root for.'

A great many books are written with the intent to challenge people's assumptions, to make readers reconsider the way they look at particular aspects of society or history or human interaction. When I hear someone dismiss a book on the grounds that 'nobody's likable', I often hear it as 'This book challenged my assumptions about something, and I didn't like it.' I know that is not always the case but I believe it is true for many of them.

So. Readers. Stop insisting books need likable characters. They do not.

Sincerely,

terabient (who is beginning to question putting [livejournal.com profile] bookfails on her f-list)
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (portal: not never but NOW)
so in a fit of boredom i was checking out ff.net's absurdly informative statistics page, and discovered a hit from a country i did not know existed before today. :0

Oh yes. the Ignorant American stereotype is being fulfilled RIGHT HERE.

(other stupid american moment: "Holy crap, i didn't know [insert country here] had internet access!" i am ashamed to admit this happened multiple times.)

i guess it's a good thing i ended up not majoring in International Politics, duuuuuuuur.
***

speaking of countries i don't know anything much about, i finished The Dark Side of Love Friday. it's easily the best book i've read this year and is quite possibly the best book i've read since Murakami's Kafka on the Shore.

...i've sat here in front of my computer screen for eighteen minutes, trying to organize my thoughts about the book, and i just can't do it. it's one of those cases when you have so much you want to say you, but end up saying nothing, because your mind just can't process all that you're thinking into something intelligible. D:

also it's like 2am and i've been up since 7am. i uh, will probably try to compose a genuine review at some point and leave it on Shelfari as there does not seem to be one for this book! this makes me a sad panda. :(

oh! maybe more than anything, The Dark Side of Love makes me want to read lots and lots of Arabian literature now, if only so i can better understand/spot all of the allusions in the book. i've only read a few selections from The Thousand and One Nights and the Fitzgerald translation of the Rubaiyat. it also makes me want to dive into French literature again, because out of the many references to French authors and novels i had only read two of them.

and now i am going to crawl under a huge pile of blankets and try not to freeze in this 30~40 F weather.

WHAT

Oct. 15th, 2009 12:41 am
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (raphael: DED)
it is currently 32 degrees outside. the weather for the next two days includes a mix of snow and rain showers.

WHAT THE HELL, NEW ENGLAND, WE'RE ONLY HALF-WAY THROUGH OCTOBER. *OCTOBER!*

i cannot deal with this cold THIS EARLY. :( :( :(

anyway! today i opened an account at the local credit union. apparently they were doing some sort of promotion, and now i have a brand new...crock pot.

i have no idea what i am going to do with it.
***

reading The Dark Side of Love by Rafik Schami, a novel that is originally written in German, and set (mostly) in early 20th century Syria, so there are a great deal of references to Arabic poetry and legends, AND since France occupied Syria for um, a while, there's a lot of French literature and history alluded to as well.

i imagine it was a total bitch to translate.

about half-way through. it is QUITE EXCELLENT though often difficult. not language-wise, surprisingly, it's simple without being Hemingway on a bad day juvenile. but subject-wise, this is the sort of book where unbearably awful things happen routinely and instead of rising to the occasion and overcoming adversity in an inspiring but clicheed fashion, people are ruthlessly crushed by the cruelty of the world around them. CRUSHED!

i wish i could be more specific and intelligent in discussing it because it's one of those books that makes you go, 'man, i think i'm reading a serious contender for the Nobel prize here,' but i'm too cold tired to make sense at this hour. besides, every review i've found is about a billion times more literate that i could be. i mean - critics are comparing this novel to Tolstoy. i haven't even read Tolstoy.

also all of this talk in the novel about the great Arabic poets and the great French novels and the reviews comparing the novel itself to the great Russian novelists makes me realize how little famous world literature i've actually read. :(

so uh

i don't know how to wrap this up so imma slink off to bed and hope i don't freeze to death. :D!

book meme!

Jul. 21st, 2009 07:50 pm
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (celica: sleepy)
taken from [livejournal.com profile] hamimifk:

27 book questions )

BOOKS

Jun. 24th, 2009 07:38 pm
terabient: A smiling sun (:D)
soooo, i have a 'shelfari' account now.



basically it is a place where you can talk about books. i found out about it through Time magazine (yeah, big internet fail there, who in my generation discovers internet apps through Time? haaaaaa) and it's pretty ok.

adding books to your list is a little unwieldly (the site assumes you've got a list of books hanging around somewhere else on these here interwebs, like Amazon, and i don't - that is kind of why i'm on Shelfari in the first place, Shelfari people - so i have to look up books individually with the search function) but the site is otherwise easy enough to use. finding ratings, reviews, recommendations, etc. isn't too difficult, and for most books/authors there are at least a few group discussions active. i haven't really tried much as far as the social networking goes, though... since i hate social networking

the hardest thing, actually, has been remembering what books i've read. i mean, last night i basically ran through two authors whose works i'm quite familiar with (Haruki Murakami and Dan Simmons) and once i'd listed everything of theirs i read, i hit a blank wall. on an amusing side note, if you don't give a date in which you've finished a book, the site apparently assumes you've just finished it...so every time i sign in, it looks like i've finshed a crapload of books in 5 minutes. XD

i noticed that as far as my reading habits are concerned i seem to latch onto a specific author (or series - HI DRAGONLANCE) and read their oeuvre obsessively until i've read everything readily available to me. i'm not sure if this is the best approach - i mean, on one hand, some of my favorite books are the more obscure writings of a popular author, but on the other hand...i end up putting off books by other authors, and so overall my book exposure is less varied than i'd like.

maybe after zombie summer, that'll be my next reading project - read books by different authors for a few months? (speaking of zombie summer, i finished Berserk a few days ago and have started on World War Z. the former was disappointing; the latter is shaping up to be excellent. may write more later on this.)

ANYWAY. if you're reading this, you should totally get a shelfari account so you can recommend me stuff to read/get stuff to read yourself/go 'omg, you like THAT book?' (or 'omg, you hate this book?') I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.

;)
terabient: A girl in a pink dress surrounded by light (celica: sleepy)
it's a little late to be starting this, but anyway: this summer, i have decided to read as much zombie-related fiction as possible.

i haven't been reading nearly as much as i used to. part of this is due to time constraints, but i've also lost a lot of enthusiasm for reading in general. in the past few months, i've picked up five new books - all recommended by various, quality book reviewers/organizations - and i haven't finished any of them; i just can't get into them. i don't know why. objectively, they aren't bad, and the themes they deal with are not exactly pedestrian in nature. but for some reason, i can't seem to concentrate enough to read them for any decent length of time.

anyway, i figured that one way to get back into my old reading habits would be to read as many books as possible about a subject i always find fascinating. i had a few other 'summer reading project' ideas - like reading all those classics i avoided in college, or trying to tackle The Tale of Genji for a third time - but these all felt too weighty for where i'm at mentally right now.

so i decided to read about ZOMBIES!

here is a preliminary list of books:

Forest of Hands and Teeth, Carrie Ryan
The Down-Home Zombie Blues, Linnea Sinclair
Breathers: A zombie's lament, S.G. Browne
Patient Zero, Jonathan Maberry
The Living Dead (Anthology)
Berserk, Tim Lebbon
World War Z, Max Brooks
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Jane Austen, Seth Grahame-Smith

it's still quite small at the moment, and won't last for the whole summer (assuming i don't lose interest). i will continue to look up books, of course, and suggestions are always welcome.

i'm not sure if i'll do anything more than simply read these books. i'd like to at least come up with a decent recommendation list after i'm done, for anyone else who loves zombies or books or zombie books, like me. i might try my hand at reviewing, too - one thing that's bothered me about a lot of book reviews i've read is that they aren't very good at describing why a book ought to be read. i'm not sure i could do a better job, but i'd like to try, at least. :p
Page generated May. 25th, 2013 07:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios